WASHINGTON– A previous clerk to Stephen R. Reinhardt, a prominent liberal appellate court judge who died in 2018, informed a congressional committee on Thursday that he” consistently and frequently “sexually harassed her and other female clerks and raged against the #MeToo motion, contending that women lodging accusations of rape and abuse against men should
not be thought. Detailing her experience working for Judge Reinhardt in 2017 and 2018, Olivia Warren, the previous clerk, affirmed prior to a subcommittee of your house Judiciary Committee that Judge Reinhardt openly talked about his female clerks’ physical appearances and on her sexual relationship with her partner.
In one instance, Ms. Warren testified, Judge Reinhardt instructed her to evaluate which of the two female candidates completing for a clerkship “had better or longer legs” and was more appealing. More frequently, Ms. Warren stated, he would disparage her physical appearance and hypothesize– sometimes in front of other workers– that her other half “must either lack a penis, or not have the ability to get an erection” in her presence since she was so unsightly.
“There may have been a day in which I was not bugged,” Ms. Warren said. “But I can not remember one after searching my memory.”
She was contacted us to testify as part of a hearing on protecting federal judicial workers from sexual discrimination and other types of office misbehavior. However Ms. Warren’s account likewise made complex the legacy of a distinguished federal judge who was when called “the liberal bad boy “of the federal bench by The Weekly Standard:”ideological, outlandish and never dull.” It was the latest circumstances of claims of sexual harassment or abuse by a powerful male from a female subordinate who described feeling scared and expertly caught in a situation beyond her control.
“I was scared,” Ms. Warren, a graduate of Harvard Law School, testified on Thursday, “afraid of upseting the judge and alienating his effective network of clerks, frightened of ending my legal profession prior to it had actually even started, frightened that the judge would precise vengeance on me.”
She stated she had attempted without success to find a method to report Judge Reinhardt’s conduct, informing members of the Harvard Law School administration, consisting of the dean, about her experience and later on approaching the federal Office of Judicial Integrity. But eventually, she stated she might not find a private way to officially lodge a problem.
The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said in a statement Thursday that “no judiciary employee need to suffer the sort of harassment described by previous law clerk Olivia Warren today” which the court system was taking her testament “really seriously.”
“We are devoted to continuing and addressing this new information to fine-tune our processes and procedures for protecting our staff members and dealing with misconduct,” the statement said.
Harvard Law School might not instantly be grabbed comment. An attempt to reach a member of Judge Reinhardt’s family for
comment was also unsuccessful. Nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter, Mr. Reinhardt struck down as unconstitutional Proposition 8, the California ballot referendum disallowing same-sex marriage; the phrase “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance; and laws forbiding doctor-assisted suicide. Each of those choices was reversed or left by the Supreme Court, but liberals celebrated them however.
In her statement, Ms. Warren described Judge Reinhardt as hostile to the #MeToo movement and “constantly” casting doubt upon allegations of sexual misbehavior, based upon his belief that “ladies were liars who could not be trusted.”
She said the judge was enraged by the scrutiny of Judge Alex Kozinski, a popular conservative who likewise served on the Ninth Circuit as an appeals judge, till he stepped down in 2017 after being implicated of subjecting his female clerks to regular unwanted sexual advances. Numerous female clerks implicated him of inquiring to view porn in his chambers and making salacious remarks directed at them.
The bombshell allegations against Judge Kozinski “became a regular focal point of our lunches and more comprehensive discussions with the judge, which often tended towards the graphic and profane,” Ms. Warren said, and included that Judge Reinhardt informed her that he meant to openly face among Judge Kozinski’s accusers.
The accuser, Leah Litman, now an assistant professor at the University of Michigan Law School, recognized herself on Twitter after Ms. Warren’s testament. She supported her part of the account, composing that Judge Reinhardt in truth had openly challenged and insulted her about her accusations.
“Even though a lot of individuals on Twitter will express assistance for you when you step forward with an allegation like this, a lot of individuals– including really effective and admired people– will be upset with you,” Ms. Litman wrote. “They will demean you and weaken you in ways you can see and ways you can not. That is part of why it is unfair to say it is the responsibility of the individual who is subject to harassment to do something about it.”
Ms. Warren told legislators on Thursday that she was encouraged to tell her story about Judge Reinhardt in the hope that future abusive conduct might be correctly dealt with. She did not mean to “erase his substantial contributions to the law,” she firmly insisted, but felt it was needed to speak up.
“The damage and pain that sexual harassment triggers, and the stress of that damage when victims have no recourse and feel they can not state or do anything about it, has long-term costs to the occupation,” she stated.